Case studyMercury · Product design

Mercury Capital

Mercury had six ways to fund a startup and no way to tell a founder which one was theirs. I designed Capital: a guided quiz, a comparable set of options and the application and servicing that follow.

Year2022
RoleProduct design, end to end
ScopeIA · Flows · UI · Copy
PartnersCapchase · Wayflyer · Payability · NeoTax
In-houseVenture debt · Mercury Raise
Mercury Capital home with explore options

Capital home · quiz entry, eligibility callout and the options list

Founders were choosing capital by vibes.

Debt, revenue-based finance, daily payout, R&D credits and equity each came with different costs, qualification rules and partners. Founders were making six-figure decisions from a blog post and a friend’s recommendation.

Mercury could already see revenue, runway and spend, so it was well placed to help. The design problem wasn’t generating offers; it was making them comparable. Six products described in six vendors’ vocabularies can’t be compared.

The work became a translation layer: one schema every product had to answer to, and a short quiz that narrowed six paths to the two or three that could work.

ONE SCHEMA, SIX PRODUCTS
WHO IT’S FORVC-funded · ecommerce · SaaS
FUNDING BASED ON20–35% of last round
TYPICALLY SPENT ONPayroll · inventory · R&D
SPEED24h – 5 days
COST OF ITDilution · fee · warrant

Before designing a single screen, I plotted every source of startup capital by amount and growth stage, including the ones Mercury doesn’t sell. It settled arguments about what Capital was for, and became the explainer we shipped.

Funding landscape mapped by funding amount and growth stage
Funding landscape by amount and growth stage.

The first build was an honest table. It was complete and unusable: every row demanded the same attention. The shipped version keeps the list scannable and moves depth into a drawer, so comparison happens between two things, not six.

Earlier table version of Capital explore options
Before · six products, six columns, no hierarchy.

Every question earns its place by eliminating a product.

Quiz — company type
Step 01 · Company type.
STEP 01 · COMPANY TYPEBusiness model, not industry

Recurring revenue, ecommerce, dropshipping, or other. This single answer decides which lenders can even look at you. Asking it first means nobody fills out four screens to be told no.

STEP 04 · FINANCING NEEDSFramed as spend, not as product

Founders don’t think “I need revenue-based finance.” They think “I need to buy inventory.” So the options are shapes of spend, and the system does the mapping.

STEP 05 · PAST SPENDINGThe question that finds free money

“Did you create or improve anything technical last tax year?” Plain language for R&D tax credits, up to $250K a founder is already owed. Most people don’t know to ask, so the quiz asks for them.

RETURN STATELeaving mid-quiz is normal

Half of founders leave mid-quiz to check a number. When they come back, Capital is filtered to their recommendations with a “Finish up” prompt instead of starting over. The unfinished state is a real state, designed on purpose.

A recommendation only helps if the application is easy to finish. Diligence reuses what the VC round already produced, and the loan gets a permanent home in the sidebar.

Diligence step with four document requests and quick connect
Diligence. Four asks, each with a downloadable example and a Quick Connect where we can pull the data instead. Application state lives in the left rail so “where am I?” is never a question.
Venture debt dashboard with available balance and draw deadline
Servicing. Available balance, the draw deadline, and the name and email of a human advisor. After closing is where trust is kept or lost.
FINANCING PATHS6in one place: four partner products, two of Mercury’s own
QUESTIONS5from “I need money” to a shortlist you can act on
DECISION TIME2 daysto a decision on venture debt, promised on the page